Neuromusculoskeletal Disorder

Descriptions in Books Game to map

That is the problem of independent descriptions.

debate, together with my beta testers book to which I spent a few paragraphs is a point that came out was very difficult to overcome and I hope to have done better.

The main problem in a book in game map is, in my opinion, that every point in the book to be described independently from the point where you get it, otherwise description should be different depending on whether you arrive from the north, East and so on.
We are accustomed to see and describe things correctly, in the movement, from the point of view of the path that led us there, but here you can not do.

Now I'm re-reading and correcting everything I was also suggested to adopt a more rigid structure where possible in the construction dei vari paragrafi:

1. descrizione del posto con dettagli
2. descrizione delle possibili scelte
3. scelte con rimandi

Quindi questo:

Ti trovi in un breve tratto di corridoio che congiunge il bivio a nord con una svolta qualche metro più a sud. Le pareti di questa sezione sono incrinate in più punti e crepe lunghe quasi quanto tutto il muro si diramano dall'alto verso il basso.
Inoltre avverti ancora quella sorda vibrazione presente in altri punti dell'Avamposto, che sale dal pavimento lungo le tue gambe, un ronzio continuo e disturbante, inframezzato da pulsazioni leggermente più accentuate.
Ti dirigi verso il bivio a nord, al <133> oppure scegli lo snodo che più disappears to the south east, the <195>?

becomes this:

The walls of this section are cracked in several places and almost as long cracks spread all over the wall from top to bottom.
also warned that dull vibration still present in other parts of the outpost, which rises from the floor along your legs, a steady hum and disturbing pulses interspersed by slightly more pronounced.
Now you're on a short stretch of corridor that connects the north with a fork to turn a few yards further south.
you walk to the junction to the north, or choose to <133> the joint that disappears to the south east, the <195>?

Opinions?